Jump to content




No Correlation Between Profile Scores And S.a.t.s


5 replies to this topic

#1 lynh56

    Feet firmly under the table!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 219 posts

Posted 16 April 2008 - 10:58 PM

Can any kind person direct me to any official website where this has been outlined. I need to show a 'from the horses mouth' version of this to my head, as there is pressure from K.S.1 staff to mark down my children and to have some children as below average on entry. There is no way they are below average on entry to F.S. The inspector has suggested there must be an issue in K.S .1 using my profile data to predict SAT results and saying the SAT results should be better. I have been moderated and in fact urged to mark 1 child up! though I stood my ground.
Thanks

#2 catma

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Full FSF Member
  • 2,092 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 17 April 2008 - 07:05 AM

This from NAA FSP report 2006:

"Some LAs and commercial companies have produced materials that attempt

to equate FSP scale points to national curriculum (NC) sub-levels and use

FSP data as a crude numerical predictor for attainment in NC key stage 1

assessments. Any equation of FSP scales or scale point scores to NC levels

or invented sub-levels is a spurious and ultimately inaccurate exercise. There

is currently no reliable numerical correlation between attainment in FSP and

NC key stage 1 assessments. Use of data generated by the FSP relies on

fully understanding the relationship between all 13 scales and how this is

used to support the next steps in children’s learning within a broad and

balanced curriculum. NAA strongly discourages the use of such materials and

continues to promote the use of Continuing the learning journey to support

effective understanding and use of FSP data."
Educational reforms are like buses, you wait for ages and then 3 come along at the same time
ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE'S A CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT

#3 Susan

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 8,098 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 April 2008 - 08:04 AM

Until Ofsted appreciate this, we are always going to be fighting this battle.
Susan

Children are like snowflakes, each one is an individual.

#4 Marion

  • Full FSF Member
  • 7,008 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 April 2008 - 09:55 AM

The link for the information catma has quoted is http://www.naa.org.u...9_fspreport.pdf
point 3 page 5
Marion


Play, while it cannot change the external realities of children’s lives, can be a vehicle for children to explore and enjoy their differences and similarities and to create, even for a brief time, a more just world where everyone is an equal and valued participant.

#5 lynh56

    Feet firmly under the table!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 219 posts

Posted 17 April 2008 - 02:20 PM

Thank you Catma and Marion, just what I want and I am printing the whole report off now and will give it to my head with the pertinent comments highlighted. I have had to give predictions of scores for end of profile, and I actually said pick a number, any number will do!!!! She said all the other staff had to set targets-make predictions and so should I

#6 HappyMaz

    Fully paid up member of the awkward squad!

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 11,650 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Maidenhead, Berkshire

Posted 17 April 2008 - 06:20 PM

View Postlynh56, on Apr 17 2008, 15:20, said:

She said all the other staff had to set targets-make predictions and so should I
Go girl! Stick up for yourself and what you believe in. Especially now you have the evidence to back up your knowledge! :o

Do let us know what happens next, won't you?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users