Brittany Correa_681115634

In other words, why isn't aforementioned capacity to override available during use of all of the other assessment frameworks? Data input is at the heart of this, right?

No, I'm saying it should be possible to input assessment data using only the drop-down menu and the rubrics consistently, across assessment frameworks throughout tapestry. The same way it's possible to do so in the forms P-scales and the Development Matters Framework.

Yes, please.

It's possible to input data on P-Scale assessments, as well as the Development Matters and Cherry Garden Frameworks, by responding to rubrics instead having to draw on observations pulled from elsewhere. Isn't it possible to respond to the rubrics of the other frameworks locally in the same way, or is the current programming of the assessment documentation set up in response to some sort of statute or something?

The Routes for Learning framework should be available on Tapestry, even though it doesn't seem like the ratio of Tapestry users who also use the framework is very high. What if there was support for users to construct assessment frameworks on the Tapestry dashboard?