To throw a spanner in the works, don't forget the statutory requirement to have the right number of staff (percentage terms) qualified to a certain level in addition to the manager/deputy being qualified to level 3. If the manager's level 3 qualification is no longer recognised by the CWDC as being full and relevant for those implementing the EYFS, then groups may be at risk of not meeting their statutory obligations under the EYFS. I know that this is a fairly drastic example, but someone in my position might easily fall into that category (only two level 3 qualified staff members in a team of six).
So it is important that setting leaders know exactly what the qualification profile of their group is and make an action plan to ensure that staff have an up todate, relevant qualification - perhaps by undertaking formal qualification training or by doing some underpinning knowledge training to supplement the original qualification. The message we've had from our early years advisers is that ignorance (of the fact that a qualification is no longer considered full and relevant) is no defence - and that Ofsted's view is that groups should have the right ratio of qualified staff in place now, and not be 'working towards'.
I haven't had an answer to my query about why the database doesn't recognise my degree and whether therefore I am technically recognised as being a Level 3 but I'll keep you posted on progress!
Maz
And Rea: your qualification might not be full and relevant but that doesn't mean you're not valid!