Jump to content




Evidence Requirements For Profiles


23 replies to this topic

#1 Dianne

    Feet firmly under the table!

  • Official FSF Saint
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 193 posts
  • Location:Deal, Kent

Posted 26 January 2004 - 07:59 PM

Hi all!

I'll start by apologising for asking questions that may have already been answered before, but I spend so much time working on my profile folder I havn't got time to look for them!

I was wondering how much evidence/assessment needs to be done for the profile i.e. does every single point ned to have a specific reference to evidence that the child is able to 'do' the item. Hmm... that doesn't seem very clear - what I mean is, say the item about "asks questions about how things work etc etc" in the K&U section - would you need evidence of each child doing this, or is it OK to think "I know that this child can do this" and tick the box? So far I have provided evidence for each point I have ticked, for each child, but sometimes look at points & think I could tick them, but I don't have any evidence, just my own knowledge of the child (am I making sense here???)

ALSO (!) I was wondering if I am collecting the appropriate evidence - I use observations, write-ups from group work or sometimes from whole class work if something stuck out in my mind, a photo album, literacy/numeracy etc books, art portfolios, computer print outs, evidence of mark making during child initiated work and informal notes I make when something "just has to be written down". What else could I use?

Hope someone is able to help me, these profiles are really getting me down at the moment.

Thanks, Dianne xxx

#2 Susan

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 8,099 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 26 January 2004 - 09:16 PM

Hi Dianne.
I think you're on the right lines, certainly I'm not doing anything else!

You should get some support in moderation through your LEA. Only 2 areas are being moderated each year, the cycle is in the back of the Profile Handbook. In my LEA, its PSE & K&U, which I think are probably the 2 most difficult anyway! But we are only going to work with 2 children.

I've just opted for a moderating meeting at end of Feb. so might know more then.
Its interesting how the profile seems to be taking over as I'm sure that was never the intention.

Susan
Susan

Children are like snowflakes, each one is an individual.

#3 Helen

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Full Member
  • 2,148 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Lewes, East Sussex

Posted 27 January 2004 - 12:54 PM

Hi Dianne,
When I worked as a FS profile moderator last year, we were told not to expect evidence for every point for every child; that is simply not feasible :o Teachers must be given credit for knowing where their children are, and if they know a child asks questions about how things work, for example, and they have done so on frequent occasions, then the point can be circled. I think the danger might arise if a teacher has a feeling that a child can do something, but they've only see this on one or two occasions; you have to be sure that it has been achieved.
If you look at page 4 of the FS profile handbook, there is an example from a profile page. This particular teacher has just jotted down notes, eg "perseverance!" and "nearly there!" Personally, I think this is too vague; there must be a happy medium somewhere!!

#4 Guest_cat33_*

  • Guests

Posted 31 January 2004 - 08:17 AM

Diane, I agree with what has been said already. You do not need evidence for each scale. Sounds as if you are keeping lots of evidence! I am just focusing on PSE as that is the area being moderated this year. We are going to write straight into the scale booklet this year too as last year we had to transfer the information at the end of the year.
I think everyone is still feeling their way round the best way and the right amount of evidence.
Seems that we are doing more assessment than the rest of the school just now!
Chris

#5 Susan

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 8,099 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 31 January 2004 - 04:59 PM

Agreed on that one Chris!
I'm sure that couldn't have been the intention but my school has certainly gone mad, I've had my knuckles rapped because I can't keep track of all 13 scales at once! (And I'm FS coordinator & on SMT.) If I thought we had a problem last year,it was nothing compared to this. :o

Susan
Susan

Children are like snowflakes, each one is an individual.

#6 mundia

    lunar gardener

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 5,442 posts
  • Location:an anenome

Posted 01 February 2004 - 10:11 AM

Has anyone been moderated this cycle ? Ours is tomorrow and they want to interview me (as phase manager-I'm based in nursery) but Im not sure what they are going to want to know.
Those of you that are moderators, can you give me a clue?
My Head just said to make sure I have my coordinators file up to date (which it is) but was fairly clueless herself. I like to be prepared, but I only found out on Friday, so will I need anything else?
Your work is going to fill a large part of your life. And the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. Steve Jobs

#7 glmaidment

    Gail

  • Full FSF Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 691 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Sturminster Newton, Dorset

Posted 01 February 2004 - 07:22 PM

Our moderation is 20 February. In the letter which notified us of the visit, we were told that the following will be of particular importance:
Teacher's files of dated observations
Profile assessments
Annotated photos which demonstrate achievement
Recent examples of children's own mark making
Paintings, drawings and models etc.

This suggests that all scales will be looked at, not just PSE and K&UW as in Annex 1 of Profile Folder. I am contacting adviser to clarify this.

Gail
Gail

#8 Guest_cat33_*

  • Guests

Posted 02 February 2004 - 06:11 PM

Mundia, how did it go? You are the first person I have heard of being moderated so give us the details!!
How probing were they? :o Chris

#9 Susan

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 8,099 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 02 February 2004 - 08:56 PM

Hope all went well Mundia.
Gail, good luck! We've got some moderating meetings to go to and some training. Seems like alot of presssure when it all starts this soon?

Susan
Susan

Children are like snowflakes, each one is an individual.

#10 mundia

    lunar gardener

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 5,442 posts
  • Location:an anenome

Posted 02 February 2004 - 10:07 PM

We were put off until later in the week as its Eid and we only had 3 children.
Your work is going to fill a large part of your life. And the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. Steve Jobs

#11 Susan

    Landscape design and gardening consultancy!

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 8,099 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 03 February 2004 - 07:17 PM

A lucky escape or prolonging the agony?

Susan
Susan

Children are like snowflakes, each one is an individual.

#12 mundia

    lunar gardener

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 5,442 posts
  • Location:an anenome

Posted 03 February 2004 - 10:24 PM

Both probably. :o
Your work is going to fill a large part of your life. And the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. Steve Jobs

#13 Mimi

    Part of the Furniture

  • Full FSF Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 900 posts
  • Location:Middlesex

Posted 04 February 2004 - 12:52 PM

I have just spent a day on profile trainning and found it mind boggling we had very little information as to how we will keep tabs on evidence 117 X 30children = 3,510 pieces of evidence but we have decided to expand the pupil profile we already keep on each child and put a grid index at the front and tick off as we enter each piece of evidence, this may be in the form of childrens drawings/work, individual written observations, class observations, photographs, postit notes. We were told that a group photo would be sufficient for class activities and that each child did not need a personal photo but how would we file this?
The choas of creativity is better than the tidiness of idleness.

#14 Johnboy

    Settling in nicely!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts
  • Location:Spain

Posted 04 February 2004 - 07:34 PM

Do you know something,this is all a bit mad!!!! :o I can see things from both perspectives,as a parent and a teacher. As a teacher its crazy and as a parent I really want to know if my child is getting on ok,not millions of details which the teacher has sweated over instead of having fun with/ teaching the kids.I realise that lots of great teachers can do it all brilliantly but it does not make our job any easier and i dont think it makes a huge difference to our knowledge of the kids and therefore our planning!Phew!!Take it all with a pinch of salt teachers-not long to Easter!
Whats for you won,t go by you!

#15 mundia

    lunar gardener

  • Moderator and FSF Saint
  • 5,442 posts
  • Location:an anenome

Posted 05 February 2004 - 05:37 PM

Well the moderation went fine. 2 children observed in each class and a comparison made of the views of the teachers and the views of the moderator which were thankfully in total agreement. A quick look at the ways in which we gather evidence (not scrutinising them, just seeing what we do), and a discussion on the issues arising as a result (I think she just wanted to take feedback from each school as she visited). That was it. No suggestion at all of collecting evidence for everything for everybody (which we dont do anyway)
So fear not, hope everyone elses are as smooth.

:D
Your work is going to fill a large part of your life. And the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. Steve Jobs





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users