Also any advisors out there, or 2nd hand advisor views re the debate on what levels on profile mean in relation to NC levels? My team has had critical comment passed on from year 1 staff who have said we've exaggerated children's levels. My argument is that my perception of what is good for a reception child may differ from their's at year 1. That said if levels are supposed to have a true equivalent measure in terms of NC that rather throws my view out of the water and I should be scoring children's achievements much lower
Angela













