Teaching Deaf Children In Mainsream Units
#1
Posted 25 October 2007 - 01:02 PM
Chrissiet
#2
Posted 25 October 2007 - 02:10 PM
mrsb
#3
Posted 25 October 2007 - 03:23 PM
Children are like snowflakes, each one is an individual.
#4
Posted 25 October 2007 - 04:32 PM
Do not work in your area of expertise but just wanted to say hi and add my welcolme to you
(Forest Witcraft)
#5
Posted 25 October 2007 - 06:47 PM
#6
Posted 25 October 2007 - 07:50 PM
I cant help either but when I was in juniors (and you can work out the year yourself!!) there were two children in my class who were deaf. Deborah and a boy. I dont think they were profoundly deaf because the teacher used a microphone only they could hear through their hearing aids. I loved them being there but they didnt stay long.
#7
Posted 25 October 2007 - 08:29 PM
She can lip read but uses sign language as well. Her class were encouraged to provide peer support and we were open with them in terms of her needs i.e. to look at her when speaking etc. They also learnt songs, rhymes and topic words using sign language, she loved this. She is fully included in all school activities and is quite a performer! However, she does not like to be put in the limelight if not on her terms. The children in her class use her radio aid as part of whole class and group discussions. She loves role play and has made social skills books demonstrating key emotions such as bullying etc. I loved teaching her and continue to be a part of her progress through my role as SENco.
Hope this is helpful
Munch
Munch
#8
Posted 26 October 2007 - 08:50 AM
Anyway it was lovely to hear about those children in mainstream school who seem to get lots of support. In our school we have 24 deaf children in all- some with additional difficulties- all with very different and unique circumstances. There are 3 F2s and by the end of the year, there'll be 7 F1s- rather a lot at the moment in fact. The mainstream staff are learning Level 1 and some are learning Level 2- respect to them. The children answer the register in sign and learn sign songs too. After a while we start to see hearing children use signs outside. I think the most difficult part of my job is encouraging the mix between deaf and hearing children as there is always a tendency for both groups to gravitate towards others like themselves.
Just a quick word to Munch- that little girl sounds as if she's doing really well, I have a colleague whose daughter has had a progressive hearing loss and has just gone to university and my own daughter is also at university with a severely deaf girl who is doing medicine. Someone once said to me that deafness isn't a disability- it's an inconvenience. So it doesn't have to stop anyone doing anything.
Sorry for going on so long. Thanks to everyone again.
#9
Posted 26 October 2007 - 06:39 PM
Totally agree. It has taken this little girl a long time to come to terms with her deafness. A real turning point was when she met a teacher of science who was deaf. This teacher came into our school to met her and talk about her personal experience. Our girl was so impressed that this person who was deaf had achieved so much. She now realises that although she is deaf she can function highly in a hearing world too. She also takes part in theatre groups outside of school, we are so proud of her. I think it is her zest for learning and life that has enabled her to succeed, something we could all do with at times! Keep up your good work.
Munch
#10
Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:53 AM
Could I just ask mrsb what a 'say it and sign it' course is? I've never heard of it.
#11
Posted 27 October 2007 - 08:41 AM
Sal
#12
Posted 30 October 2007 - 11:36 AM
I also worked in as school with a hearing impaired unit, with a variety of children with all sorts of hearing loss. We used sign language, which all children learned basic signs, some used radio aids, and we recently had the soundfield system installed. These are great even for non hearing impaired children, and certainly save on voice strain in a busy classroom.
Some staff formally had sign language qualifications, I got to level 2 myself and then gave up! My best friend was an interpreter for the deaf, her job was really interesting.
#13
Posted 24 November 2007 - 11:35 AM
For the past year we have had a Deaf member of staff who teaches signing classes and then works in school for part of the week. It's an absolute joy watching how she signs a story. Our mainstream staff are also learning signing and as a result there are more signing conversations in the staffroom and our F2 children are now seen much more as members of the class even though I have to withdraw them for literacy and some maths.
#14
Posted 24 November 2007 - 04:33 PM
I didn't welcome you when I read your first post - sorry! I'm sure you'll enjoy the forum - there's a wealth of expertise and experience on here to exploit!
I was interested that you call yourself a 'Teacher of the Deaf' and had a query about current terminology. I raise this because one of the professionals I come into contact with calls herself 'Teacher of the Hearing Impaired'. I like to use clear, appropriate language which won't cause offence whilst not pandering to every whim of the PC-brigade!
'Hearing impaired' sounds a bit PC but does appear to be more inclusive, whereas 'deaf' seems to exclude those children who can hear, but have slight or significant difficulty.
Is there a concensus of opinion about the language we should be using?
Maz
#15
Posted 24 November 2007 - 04:50 PM
Hope that make sense?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











